- Report this article
Corbin Grimes, SPC6, LPM, SA, CSM, POPM
Corbin Grimes, SPC6, LPM, SA, CSM, POPM
Portfolio Management Leader | Strategy & Planning | Transformation | Continuous Improvement | Consultant | Coach | Problem Solver | Delivery Leader | Program Manager | IT Project Manager
Published Aug 28, 2023
+ Follow
Introduction:
Project Portfolio Management (PPM) offers organizations a structured approach to effectively manage their portfolio of projects and ensure alignment with strategic goals. Over time, different approaches to PPM have emerged, each with its unique characteristics and advantages. In this article, we explore the key differences between three prominent PPM methodologies: traditional project portfolio management, lean portfolio management, and strategic portfolio management.
Traditional Project Portfolio Management (PPM):
Traditional PPM is a well-established and widely adopted methodology that focuses on balancing competing priorities and optimizing resource allocation. It typically follows a top-down approach, where project selection and prioritization are based on financial metrics such as return on investment (ROI) and net present value (NPV).
Key characteristics of traditional PPM include a heavy emphasis on financial analysis, centralized decision-making, and a formal governance structure. Projects are evaluated based on their individual merit, with limited consideration for interdependencies between projects. This approach often requires a comprehensive planning phase and a dedicated project management office (PMO).
Lean Portfolio Management (LPM):
LPM is derived from lean thinking principles, which originated in the manufacturing industry and were later applied to software development and project management. LPM focuses on eliminating waste, improving value delivery, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement. It promotes a collaborative approach and encourages decentralized decision-making.
Unlike traditional PPM, LPM emphasizes cross-functional teams, iterative planning, and regular feedback loops. It aims to optimize flow, increase customer value, and manage the portfolio dynamically. Lean metrics, such as cycle time, lead time, and throughput, are used to measure performance and guide decision-making.
Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM):
SPM takes PPM a step further by placing a greater emphasis on strategic alignment and long-term value creation. It recognizes the need for organizations to adapt to rapidly changing market conditions and pursue innovation to remain competitive. SPM involves a more proactive, forward-thinking approach to portfolio management.
In SPM, projects are evaluated not just for their financial potential but also for their strategic fit and contribution to the organization's goals. It emphasizes a holistic and integrated view of the portfolio, considering factors such as market trends, competitive landscape, emerging technologies, and customer demands. SPM requires a flexible governance structure and continuous monitoring of portfolio performance.
Key Differences and Considerations:
1. Decision-making: Traditional PPM relies on centralized decision-making, while both LPM and SPM encourage decentralized decision-making and active participation from cross-functional teams.
2. Metrics: Traditional PPM focuses on financial metrics, whereas LPM emphasizes lean performance metrics and SPM considers a blend of strategic, financial, and operational metrics.
3. Agility and Flexibility: LPM and SPM prioritize flexibility and adaptability, allowing for iterative planning and adjustment of priorities based on changing requirements and market conditions.
4. Strategic Alignment: While all three methodologies consider strategic alignment to some extent, SPM places the greatest emphasis on ensuring that projects contribute to the organization's strategic objectives.
Conclusion:
Choose the PPM methodology that best aligns with your organization's goals, culture, and environment. If financial optimization and centralized decision-making are critical, traditional PPM may be suitable. If efficiency, collaboration, and waste reduction are key, LPM could be the right fit. And if strategic alignment and long-term value creation are top priorities, SPM might be the way to go.
Remember that PPM methodologies are not mutually exclusive, and organizations may choose to adopt elements from different approaches based on their specific needs and circ*mstances. The ultimate aim is to establish a robust portfolio management framework that drives value, supports innovation, and enables successful project delivery.
Help improve contributions
Mark contributions as unhelpful if you find them irrelevant or not valuable to the article. This feedback is private to you and won’t be shared publicly.
Contribution hidden for you
This feedback is never shared publicly, we’ll use it to show better contributions to everyone.
Like
Celebrate
Support
Love
Insightful
Funny
5
To view or add a comment, sign in
More articles by this author
No more previous content
- Open To Work - A bit about how I can help you! :) Apr 16, 2024
- Thoughts on life's priorities... Mar 29, 2024
- Becoming a Leader in the Business World Without a Leadership Title Sep 1, 2023
- Mastering the Art of Business Investment Prioritization: A Lean and Agile Approach Sep 1, 2023
- 100 Reasons Why Remote Work is Winning According to Studies Sep 1, 2023
- 50+ Reasons I Love to Work From Home Nov 30, 2021
- "Just keep swimming..." Jul 1, 2020
- Hiring in South Denver, CO? Jul 1, 2020
- All in a days work... May 8, 2020
No more next content
Sign in
Stay updated on your professional world
Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
Explore topics
- Sales
- Marketing
- Business Administration
- HR Management
- Content Management
- Engineering
- Soft Skills
- See All