Related Papers
THE IMPACT OF THE U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2020 ON THE SECTORAL INDICES OF INDIAN STOCK MARKET
Mahesh Dahal
The study analyzes the impact of one of the global political events, the U.S. presidential election 2020, on the various sectoral indices of the Indian Stock Market. The literature provides a strong relationship between the U.S. presidential election and the Indian stock market, where it is shown that the ideology, policy and the party affiliation of the elected President plays a significant role that influences the ties between the two nations and thereby the economy in a long run. And this long-run implication has an immediate impact which is reflected through the stock market behavior around the election period. In the election of 2020 both the presidential candidates have expressed their views on India and Indian government, which is likely to influence the ties between the two nations. Based on the expert opinions and media outlet the present study hypothesized that the Indian Stock Market reacts negatively to the prospect of Joe Biden winning the U.S. presidential election 2020. The study examined the short-term market reaction using cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) and cumulative average abnormal returns (CAARs) calculated by employing two factor model under event study methodology, whereas the long-run impact is examined by regressing abnormal return with election dummy. Based on the analysis, the study concluded that during the short-run window, the U.S. Presidential election does impact the Indian sectoral indices in a positive manner. However, in the long run, the election had no impact, thus concluded that Indian stock market is efficient in long-runs.
International review of public policy
Biden’s Foreign Economic Policy: Crossbreed of Obama and Trump?
2022 •
Christoph Scherrer
Politeja
Divide and Rule: Political Impact of President Trump’s US-Mexico Border Wall Initiative
2023 •
Paweł Laidler
America at the Crossroads
America at the Crossroads, April 18,
2020 •
Welby Cox
Without being partisan, it may be useful to read this manuscript which I wrote in 2020 about former President Donald Trump and the politics which doomed his presidency.
Political Insight
Donald Trump’s Re-election Prospects
2020 •
John E Owens
The article examines the current polling data and finds the odds stacked against a Trump victory in November 2020, with the incumbent’s underlying electoral vulnerability compounded by his chaotic response to domestic crises.
Quaderni dell Osservatorio elettorale QOE - IJES
The fragile blue wall: analyzing geographies of the 2020 US presidential election
2021 •
John Agnew
US presidential elections are peculiar contests based on mediation by an Electoral College in which votes are aggregated on a state-by-state basis. In 2020, as in 2016, the outcome was decided by a set of states where the two candidates were equally competitive: Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Two geographical stories tend to dominate accounts of what happened in 2020. The first story is based on red (Republican) versus blue (Democratic) states, and the second story relies upon rural versus urban biases in support for the two parties. After showing how and where Donald Trump outperformed the expectations of pre-election polls, we consider these two geographical stories both generally, and more specifically, in relation to the crucial swing states. Through an examination of the successes of Joe Biden in Arizona and Georgia, two states long thought of as “red”, and the role of the suburbs and local particularities in producing this result, we conclude that the polarization of t...
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Is Good News for Donald Trump Bad News for the Peso
2016 •
Hyeongwoo Kim
ASRIE Analytica
Partial Legitimacy of the Biden Administration and What It Means for the USA and the World. Geopolitical Report. ASRIE Analytica: Rome. 2021.
2021 •
Evgeny Pashentsev
Retro or radical
Zhe Zhang
Political Power and Social Theory
Trump, Biden, and Why Elections Don't Bring Bigger Policy Changes
2023 •
Kevin A Young
Most US activists place a high priority on elections. The default strategy for those seeking policy change is some combination of electoral campaigning and pressure campaigns targeting politicians. Yet policies show a high degree of continuity across recent presidential administrations. Despite substantial differences in rhetoric and legislative agendas, the policies resulting from Republican and Democratic presidencies have stayed within a narrow range, defined by the promotion of corporate profits, the impunity of law enforcement agencies, the defense of imperial prerogatives, and nearly unfettered ecological destruction. Focusing on the Trump and Biden presidencies, I analyze some of the structural barriers that inhibit major policy change. I also explore why the ruling class as a whole has not yet united against parasitic industries like fossil fuels and pharmaceuticals that endanger the interests of other capitalists. I argue that activists must move beyond electoral and legislative approaches by directly disrupting ruling-class interests that have the power to change policy. Only then will we win major progressive reform.
